National Park Service, Arendt, and Nürnburg, Oh My

If you remember, the other day we talked a bit about Hannah Arendt. The article is here and is worthwhile if you haven’t read it. But one quote struck me as explaining quite a lot of what we are seeing in the United States today.

As governments start losing their legitimacy, violence becomes an artificial means toward the same end and is therefore, found only in the absence of power. Bureaucracies then become the ideal birthplaces of violence since they are defined as the “rule by no one” against whom to argue and therefore, recreate the missing links with the people they rule over.

Think about that for a bit. As a government becomes illegitimate it loses power because power is based on leadership, agreement, and cooperation. It then begins to rely on violence, and the perpetrator is nearly always a bureaucracy because they are the classic “no one” is responsible.

Sound familiar?

 Jonathan Jarvis

Jonathan Jarvis

Streiff over at RedState yesterday had something to say about the situation in the country since the shutdown (which is really merely a slowdown)

This could not succeed without the assistance of a corps of facilitators, Little Eichmanns, if you will, who are willing to abuse their fellow citizens in order to better serve their master. The most prominent of these is a yob named Jonathan Jarvis who runs the National Park Service.

Since the shutdown began last week the National Park Service has lived up to its reputation as a churlish, imperious, and unreasonable steward of the nation’s parks and monuments.

None of these facilities need any support whatsoever from the National Park Service. Instead of saving money, funds have been expended over and above requirements in pursuit of this asshattery. More importantly, none of this could happen without the willing and enthusiastic cooperation of bureaucrats whose first allegiance is to a political party and not to the American people

I know many of you think the Eichmann reference is too harsh. But is it, really? Remember Ms. Arendt told us in that article that she really believed that Eichmann really didn’t believe he had committed any crime. He was merely doing his job.

But, you know traditionally, which was brought out strongly at Nürnberg, a commander (or for that matter any executive) is responsible for the acts of his subordinates. The principle goes far back into history, in fact to King Ahab and the killing of Naboth on orders from Queen Jezebel. And further [from Wikipedia]

The trial of Peter von Hagenbach by an ad hoc tribunal of the Holy Roman Empire in 1474, was the first “international” recognition of commanders’ obligations to act lawfully. Hagenbach was put on trial for atrocities committed during the occupation of Breisach, found guilty of war crimes and beheaded. Since he was convicted for crimes “he as a knight was deemed to have a duty to prevent” Hagenbach defended himself by arguing that he was only following orders from the Duke of Burgundy, Charles the Bold, to whom the Holy Roman Empire had given Breisach. Despite the fact there was no explicit use of a doctrine of “command responsibility” it is seen as the first trial based on this principle.

This case shows us both sides of the issue. Von Hagenbach was convicted both for his own actions and for his subordinates. Note that this does nothing to shield the subordinates from blame either. They are still responsible for their own actions.

In the case of the United States, all federal (and at least most state and local as well) officials take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, not the executive. All officials are responsible to make sure their actions are consistent with the Constitution, not just the courts.

And so each and every person who is inflicting a loss of rights on the American people from the rookie NPS Ranger to the President of the United States is responsible.

Every One of them should be Fired, Now

 

About these ads

About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

3 Responses to National Park Service, Arendt, and Nürnburg, Oh My

  1. boudicabpi says:

    Reblogged this on BPI reblog and commented:
    National Park Service, Arendt, and Nürnburg, Oh My

    • NEO says:

      Thanks

  2. Pingback: National Park Service, Arendt, and Nürnburg, Oh My | Boudica BPI Weblog

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s