NEO:

It’s a major improvement. What is correct constitutionally is that the government (at any level) should have to show cause why I should not be allowed to carry any arm I wish in any manner I choose. We threw away our right to fully automatic weapons in a side effect of prohibition, that too (the National Firearm Act) should be challenged.

Originally posted on blogsense-by-barb:

Concealed Carry Reciprocity – What’s a Federalist to Do?

By Gregory K. Taggart · Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Passed by the House as H.R. 822 and pending in the Senate as S. 2188 “The National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act”, is legislation which would require each state that issues pistol carry licenses to recognize those issued by other states. The debate over this issue has created a strange situation — committed leftists who believe that Congress can mandate that the several states serve broccoli in school lunches, and who have no problem with federal bureaucrats controlling intrastate toilet design are suddenly “state’s rights” purists. They now utter sound bite phrases such as “… you can’t make the states recognize gun rights if they don’t want to…” Allied with these folks are some real defenders of liberty, who believe that Federal compulsion of the states for any purpose is wrong.

Whether raised…

View original 686 more words

About these ads

About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s