We Fight, Get Beat, Rise, and Fight Again



The motto above is from General Green, who wore down the British forces in the Southern campaign of the Revolutionary war. Eventually, with the help of General Washington‘s Continental Army, the Comte Rochambeau’s French Army, and the French fleet under de Grasse, Lord Cornwallis was pinned in at Yorktown, and finally the band played The World Turned Upside Down, I suspect you know the rest.

Why am I writing about this? Because it’s a very good comparison to the war we conservative are waging against the statists.

Daren Jonescu posted an article at American Thinker the other day that delineates and summarizes many of the things we are seeing from the left recently. [Contrary to my usual practice I’m going to print the entire article.]

Conservatives Have a Secret

Can conservatives be revolutionaries?  Given the level of crisis into which civilization has fallen, and that the unfolding disaster is the result of what is now called “liberalism,” it behooves us to ask whether the only serious countervailing force, “conservatism,” is up to the task of radical change.

At face value, conservatism would seem to be a position of reserve, caution, and resistance to change.  How, then, can conservatives — anti-radicals by nature — turn back the tide of political and moral devolution that has led the once-free world to the brink of economic collapse and tyranny?

Just a note here, The American Revolution was essentially a conservative revolution too. It started trying to retain our rights as English freeman.

I believe that the answer, paradoxically, is that they can turn it back by failing to turn it back.  To see how this makes sense, a little context is necessary.

Despite all of Barack Obama’s hoopla about “fundamentally transforming” America, the truth of the matter is even scarier than Obama’s threatening promise: the fundamental transformation has, to a large extent, already happened.  Contemporary society has been gradually undermined, in the strict sense of having had its terrain booby-trapped with moral explosives, over many decades.  Obama’s promised transformation is merely the paperwork, writing into law what has already been accomplished in culture.

In short, Western society has essentially ceased to be the glorious crown of humanity that it once was.  The wellspring of ethical individualism has regressed into a fear-addled horde of collectivists.

The philosophical birthplace of the individuated soul with its higher callings — philosophy, art, faith — has devolved into an orgy of mindless pleasure pursued at the expense of any concern for, or belief in, the difference between scratching an itch and contemplating the divine.

And the civilization that, through its dual focus on human reason and the individual soul, planted the seed of that political liberty which is literally inconceivable in any other historical context has allowed itself to recede into an increasingly unvarnished mob of angry, frightened children clamoring for their “fair share,” for what they are “entitled to” — for a ruler to take care of them, freedom be damned.

The West’s economic insolvency is merely a practical manifestation of moral bankruptcy.  America’s irreversible prison sentence of debt stretching for generations into the future is only a foreshadowing of the more explicit form of bondage that takes hold of societies after they disintegrate into practical despair and irrationality.

Sound pretty familiar doesn’t it?

No doubt some readers, at this point, are thinking, “That may be the path some people are on, but there are millions of us who will refuse to let it happen.”  And it is quite true that conservative resistance to the scenario I have described is substantial, and has been so for decades.  That is precisely the point: the resistance has always been there, and yet the devolution continues, slowed but ultimately unabated.

It is true that there has always, particularly in America, been a strong conservative minority to say “no” to each new infringement on reason, decency, and liberty.  Nevertheless, the “yes” side usually wins, eventually if not immediately.  In boxing terms, you cannot win going backwards.  Even the most talented defender must finally step forward and throw punches.  But in politics and culture, “forward,” as we know, is the method and slogan of the left, and not the natural instinct of conservatives.

Thus, the traditional question becomes more pressing every day: what are conservatives trying to “conserve” at this point?  In other words, hasn’t mere resistance proven futile?

Painfully disappointing, yes — but futile, no.  The difference between the way America and the rest of the West have reached their respective tipping points gives us a clue to the long-term value of short term failure.

Most of Europe, for example, has drifted sleepily into socialism.  The conservative resistance, such as it was, remained much smaller and milder, and, for the most part, it lacked a clear set of principles to guide its efforts.  That is why Europe has made leftward “progress” far faster than America.

Each European nation undergoes brief spasms of dissatisfaction with the inefficiencies of socialism, and hence reintroduces a few carefully regulated “market elements” to stabilize its labor force, its health care system, etc.  Through it all, however, sovereign nations have dissolved into an supranational socialist “union”; work — in the old-fashioned sense of productive effort you must make to support yourself — is generally regarded as gauche and distasteful, and when Europeans are surprised by a financial doomsday they never saw coming, they take to the streets — not to demand the changes needed to avert catastrophe, but to demand that doomsday be canceled because it is interrupting their lifelong state-subsidized vacation.

America, while following the same pattern of leftward drift, has done so kicking and screaming.  The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are simply too clear and stately to admit of being tossed into the fire.  Or rather, there are many who would happily do exactly that, but the documents remain cherished fundamentals to so many Americans that progressives have been forced to try to finesse their way around founding principles that are far too clear to be fudged.

The Founding Documents, The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and the Federalist papers, which explain it all, makes all the difference. We have a blueprint, ink on parchment, to tell us how it’s supposed to be.

Hence, with each “forward” step, the left exposes itself further as essentially opposed to those founding principles — i.e., as essentially un-American.  This reveals the precise advantage American conservatives have over their brethren in other nations.  If conservatism is at its core a philosophy of resistance to change, then conservatives are lost if they cannot isolate the point from which the change they are resisting began.  In other words, once again, they must have a clear understanding of what they are trying to “conserve.”

How can the conservatives of other nations define their cause?  What are they seeking to preserve, or to return to?  They and their position are too easily reducible to a combination of nostalgia and stodginess.  They are embarrassed by the perception, promoted by liberals, that they are merely old fogeys who fear the new.  This is why the supposed elected representatives of conservatism are so quick to adopt or accommodate “progressive” policy ideas.  They cannot even explain to themselves why they are resisting.

American conservatives, by contrast, know exactly what they are seeking to conserve, and why.  They have the special advantage of having been bequeathed a precise theoretical explanation of their nation and its system of government, one which is impervious to changing practical circumstances and speaks to the primary needs of humanity — self-preservation, freedom from coercion, and the opportunity to develop oneself through one’s own efforts.

And yet, despite the powerful constitutional shield and all the will in the world, American conservatives have thus far failed to turn back the progressive tide.  They have, however, done what committed conservatives can do — namely, challenge “progress” at every turn, keep every counterargument to leftism floating through the public consciousness, and frustrate the left’s propaganda methods by exposing them to the light of common sense.

The net result, inevitably, has not been “success,” inasmuch as the authoritarian left has not been stymied outright.  Conservatives have, however, by their continued resistance, forced the liberals into assuming increasingly aggressive postures in order to achieve their goals.  In other words, the smooth transition into collectivist authoritarianism has not happened in America as it happened, or is currently happening, everywhere else, because conservatives have not let it happen.

The “democratic” left has had to work harder in America than anywhere else — and, consequently, has had to show its teeth more plainly in America than anywhere else.  And this, I suspect, demonstrates how conservatives, if they have staying power through the very hard years ahead, can win.

Friedrich Nietzsche, in his final sane months, produced this bracing analysis of the West’s future (our present) as he saw it:

Whispered into the ear of the conservative. — What was not known formerly, what is known, or might be known today: a reversion, a return in any sense or degree is simply not possible.  We physiologists know that.  Yet all priests and moralists have believed the opposite — they wanted to take mankind back, to screw it back, to a former measure of virtue….  Even the politicians have aped the preachers of virtue at this point: today too there are still parties whose dream it is that all things might walk backwards like crabs.  But no one is free to be a crab.  Nothing avails: one must go forward — step by step further into decadence (that is my definition of modern “progress”).  One can check this development and thus dam up degeneration, gather it and make it more vehement and sudden: more than this one cannot do. (Twilight of the Idols, §43, emphasis added.)

The final sentence of this passage, overwhelming with a stroke of irony worthy of Socrates, explains the means to conservative victory.  Damming up the degeneration — in this case, the century-old wave of cultural and political progressivism — is dangerous, as it serves to “gather” the force of the wave, adding to its power and “vehemence.”  Yet this dangerous process of thwarting the left until it becomes outraged and angry serves a purpose worthy of the risk.  We are seeing this scenario played out before us today.

The modern left has won most of the West by presenting itself as the voice of “the people,” even as it gently fastens its shackles on the ankles of mankind.  This is why the rest of the world finds Americans unfathomable for resisting these restraints applied in the name of “security” and “equality.”  Practical difficulties notwithstanding, Europe never doubted the left’s intentions.  Thus, for sixty years, the drowning waters have flowed evenly and soothingly through the Western world — except in America.

America resisted.  She refused to be ashamed of her growing isolation.  The left co-opted the education system, the judicial system, the bureaucracy, the press, and the arts.  And yet genuine conservatives refused to be mollified, or embarrassed into acquiescing.  They have watched dam after dam get blown away by leftist encroachments.  But they rebuild the dams.

The result of this resistance, increasingly apparent for decades, has become palpable: whereas the European left presents itself, and even sees itself, as a friend of Europe, the American left has been antagonized into presenting itself more and more openly as the enemy of America.

As many have noted, the declared goal of “fundamentally transforming” America clearly implies a basic distaste for America and Americans.  Obama’s “You didn’t build that” is an open spit in the face to the most time-honored notion of national self-identity, the American Dream; Nancy Pelosi’s “Are you serious?” when asked where Congress gets the constitutional authority to force citizens to purchase health insurance displays an open disregard for the principle of limited government; the media’s knee-jerk search for law-abiding Tea Partiers behind every act of mass murder reveals the left’s hatred of people who care about their freedom.

These revelations — the progressives showing their true colors — are the direct result of decades of conservative resistance.  The statist left, having won the day everywhere else, has become flustered and furious at its inability to seal the deal in America.  Thanks to conservative dams, the progressive current has, as Nietzsche whispered, gathered strength and become more “vehement.”  This strength and this vehemence have manifested themselves in angry, careless lurches, wild punches that expose progressives and their real agenda more fully than they would ever have wished to expose themselves.

And their open aggression has, as it were, awakened a sleeping giant.  The Tea Party is the direct product of progressivism’s excessive “vehemence.”  And the Tea Party’s effect, in turn, has been to stoke the left’s ire that much further.  Even President Obama, who was intended to be the European-style kinder, gentler face of socialism, has become angry at this resistance and has dropped the veneer.

The entire Democratic Party, from the top down, now looks like Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright.  The hatred of America is open.  The desire to undo American constitutionalism is explicit.  And this exposure will only accelerate in the coming months and years, as the left realizes ever more acutely that its days as an accepted political faction are numbered, and it is forced to take increasingly drastic and sudden measures to achieve its brutal aims before the clock runs out.

The days lying ahead of America will often be treacherous and sad.  They will require nerves of steel from those who would resist progressivism’s desperate last stand.  It has become patently clear that the present Republican Party establishment is not up for this fight.  Constitutional conservatives must do it themselves, using the GOP apparatus as just one tool.  They must remain cool and workmanlike, rebuilding dams faster than the leftist waves can knock them down.

This is the means to conservative victory.  One cannot merely “go back” to a better time.  Societal decay cannot simply be undone.  One must allow — even encourage — the progressive degeneration to play itself out, fighting it at every turn until the leftists, seething with an increasingly open hatred of America, overplay their hand and self-destruct.  Finally, thanks to steadfast conservative resistance, “progressivism” will be fully exposed for the empty, anti-human power lust that it truly is.

Power-lust masked as “caring government” — the entitlement society — can still win support, unfortunately.  By gradually forcing progressives out from behind the mask, however, conservatives can at last destroy the illusion that is leftism, leading not to a “reversal” or a “return,” but rather to renewal.  This is conservatism’s well-kept secret — the secret hidden in its very nature: from a long series of hard-fought failures can come sudden victory.

Conservatives Have a Secret – John Malcolm.

Do you see why I use the example of General Gates? It’s going to be that kind of war. Victory, while possible, will be very hard and drawn out. No guarantees, either. But this fits the facts as I know them to be.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace– but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Patrick Henry March 23, 1775.



About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

24 Responses to We Fight, Get Beat, Rise, and Fight Again

  1. JessicaHof says:

    That’s a great and uplifting post.


    • i think so too, although its going to be a hard fight, in dark skies and high waters.


      • JessicaHof says:

        It seems it is always so – alas. We learn so little.


        • No, that’s not entirely true, we learn that we can win, even if we lose the battles, even if we need help from our friends.


        • JessicaHof says:

          Yes, yes, good point – that is probably the little we learn – but it is vital 🙂


        • I think so 🙂


        • JessicaHof says:

          Yes, yes, I am sure you are right – we shall prevail if we have faith and courage. 🙂


        • Along with determination and staying power. But we’ve doing it for a hundred years over here. 🙂 What’s a few more decades.


        • JessicaHof says:

          Yes, I think it is a mistake to underestimate the American spirit – see where it got the Axis in the last great war 🙂


        • Yeah, we did all right but we wouldn’t have if you hadn’t hung there till the Japanese got us all motivated. 🙂


        • JessicaHof says:

          That’s why we make such a good partnership 🙂 xx


        • That we do 🙂


        • JessicaHof says:

          God bless America! X


        • Amen! X


  2. Too many academics refuse to acknowledge the influence the Founders had on the world. They built their careers on pointing out American failures.


    • You’re exactly right. America got far more right, even in the beginning and we have improved all the time. I’ve had that argument a few times, and once I willingly paid the price in my grade but, she was unusually insufferable. Vindictive b****, by the end of class she was stuttering and confused because I picked up allies as I went on. Cost me a 6.0 got a 4.1, worth it.


  3. Reblogged this on Practically Historical.


  4. Pingback: The New Jerusalem, or Walsingham « nebraskaenergyobserver

  5. Pingback: The New Jerusalem, or Walsingham « The Constitution Club

  6. bydesign001 says:




    • Hear, Hear!!


  7. bydesign001 says:

    Dave, This post is so inspirational, words cannot explain how I felt as I read it. I must admit that by the time I completed reading your post, I felt inspired and sort or a rebirth.

    After this week’s political news, the ugly war against Conservatives and Romney waged by Obama and fellow Commies, your post came right on time.

    THANK YOU patriot.Hence, I have reposted it on both blogs. In a bit, it will be also posted over at Grumpy Opinions, http://grumpyelder.com/?p=37982&preview=true.



    • Denise, I had much the same reaction when reading the sourcelink, one of those that just filled the hole. Tahnks again


  8. Pingback: We Fight, Get Beat, Rise, and Fight Again | Grumpy Opinions

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.