Actions Have Consequences: Gun Legislation Edition

You know, businesses are kind of funny, they really like to be a respected member of their  communities, it’s not absolutely necessary but it sure makes life easier. I can tell you from experience that it’s no fun at all to work your butt off building a company to have the state and local government demonize what you’re doing. Especially since you are likely paying a million dollars + into the local economy, your employees, your suppliers, the people that help you as contractors and all the rest, plus of course all the taxes a business pays. You would think a city would be grateful, and in truth, most are.

But I guess if your a gun grabbing librul it’s better to get more people on welfare than to have people work for such a firm as Magpull, or Colt Competition, or Mossberg.

Least it looks that way, these firms are all looking (or have found) a new home, where people will respect them for what they do-and do superbly well.

Was this what Colorado and Connecticut had in mind? I doubt it but I also strongly doubt they had any intention of thinking through this or any other problem, our lords and master haven’t tried doing that in years. That’s a good deal of why the country is so screwed up.

From The Firewall

L-Colt-factoryIn Connecticut, the exodus has already begun. The first gunmaker to pack up and leave is Bristol-based PTR Industries, which announced earlier this month via Facebook that it would be taking its 40 jobs and $50,000 weekly payroll to another state.

“With a heavy heart but a clear mind, we have been forced to decide that our business can no longer survive in Connecticut – the former Constitution state,” PTR said in a statement earlier this month.
AR-15 manufacturer Stag Arms could soon follow suit along with Colt Competition and Mossberg & Sons.
In Connecticut alone, the gun making business employs 3,000 state workers and generates about $1.75 billion in annual taxable revenues. Some say the gun industry’s sprint to move out of state will be a sizeable hit to the state’s economy.

Continue reading Colorado, Connecticut Chase Out Gun Manufacturers.

They would surely be welcome here, we like jobs, guns too



About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

2 Responses to Actions Have Consequences: Gun Legislation Edition

  1. giliar says:

    Until we ge a leader who can once again unite this country, I see a continued division of the states and eventually an actual schism.


    • NEO says:

      A lot of truth in that, Gilia.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s