Is It Time To Admit Character Doesn’t Matter?

Sadly, this is pretty much true. In some ways, we have been lying to ourselves all my life, and likely much longer.

[…] Maybe we vote largely on policy or, as they say, an assessment as to which candidate is best for our wallet, but character is a deal-breaker. Bad character equals no vote, it is thought. Hence: Unleash the dogs of investigative journalism and lay bare as many foibles, peccadilloes, and bad grade-school report cards you can unearth. It goes to character.

How much more do we need to see to know this notion is entirely preposterous? The only character issues most voters care about are the ones associated with the candidates they have no intention of voting for: Yes, those character flaws they care about. A lot. […]

Three presidents, [Kennedy, Nixon, Clinton] all men of very questionable “character,” as that term is customarily (and rather incessantly) applied in the context of presidential political gymnastics. No, that’s not all they were, but it is certainly part of what they were.

All three were given a pass by the majority of the electorate, and they were given that pass for the same reason and in the same way Hillary and Donald are currently being given a “character” pass.

That Brings Us to Hillary and Donald

Does anyone—other than Hillary supporters—have the ability to un-see the completely obvious corruption, insider finagling, roaring personal ambition, arrogance, phony-baloney pandering, and habitual prevarication (okay, call it “Clintonian Parsing”) that has draped her entire career, a level of broad-based malfeasance that would not only disqualify anyone else for any public office, but most likely land him in the pokey?

He is a guy willing to cut off the health insurance of a deathly ill infant nephew if it suits his purposes.

Does anyone—other than Trump supporters—not understand that he has made his fortune by cynically buying off politicians to get them to put their thumbs on the scale, his scale; that, over and over he has shown a willingness to say or do anything to further his own personal interests, happy to roll over anyone or anything that stands in his way; that at his own father’s funeral all he could talk about was himself, that he is a guy willing to cut off the health insuranceof a deathly ill infant nephew if it suits his purposes; that he is a nasty, mean-spirited bully obsessed with self-aggrandizement so rampaging that it is possible to imagine him doing just about anything, changing any position at any time, in order to get his next magazine cover; and that his level of debate discourse rises only insignificantly above “Your mother wears combat boots”?

They don’t care. Or, more accurately, character only counts if it’s the other guy we’re talking about, and, even then, it only counts with people already inclined against the candidate, serving to deepen their antipathy, not create it.

via Is It Time To Admit Character Doesn’t Matter?.

I’d say it is, or it’s time to get over our prejudices and make it matter again.


About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

10 Responses to Is It Time To Admit Character Doesn’t Matter?

  1. Indeed moral character has been lost for quite sometime in the Western culture, it’s a very fallen modernity and postmodernity! Of course as I have been pounding it for several years now especially, WE are staring – into confusion – unto the Eschatological End… And most are simply oblivious to it!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. the unit says:

    Finally for me in the debates a yes or no question. No.

    Liked by 1 person

    • NEO says:

      Me too, but I suspect we’re a minority, and perhaps a small one.

      Liked by 1 person

      • the unit says:

        Yes, Disneyworld had a thing…’It’s a small world isn’t it.’

        Liked by 1 person

        • NEO says:

          It surely, after all! 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: My Article Read (2-5-2016) – My Daily Musing

  4. While I concur that character in politicians is not the pinnacle reason politicians are elected in the USA, I have to defend Trump and his methods of dealing with politicians. What he realized dealing with them seems to be the same observation made and recorded by the wisest man in history 3000 years ago.

    A clandestine gift deflects rage, and a bribe in the pocket fierce anger. (Proverb 21:14)

    The theocracy of politicians is many accept a bribe to pay for their campaign. Then the politicians bribe people by making promises when the campaign to bribe voters to vote from them to deflect the rage. Their rage is because of the absent mindless of previous politicians who after being elected, forget their promise to the voter, by rarely to the campaign contributor.

    Regards and goodwill blogging.

    Liked by 1 person

    • NEO says:

      Lots of truth in that! Reminds me of (I think) mark twain once said, “We have the best Congress money can buy.” He was slightly wrong though, they’re not bought, mere on a short term lease! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Short term lease! Some of these guys have been in Congress their whole working lives. Wish we could get them to vote for term limits for themselves. But that will never happen because the gig abd benefits in Washington sure beats having to work for a living or in a private law practice.

    Regards nd goodwill blogging.

    Liked by 1 person

    • NEO says:

      Yep, that’s pretty much how I see it.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.