The End Of Identity Politics

womens_marchFrom Victor Davis Hanson

Who are we? asked the liberal social scientist Samuel Huntington over a decade ago in a well-reasoned but controversial book. Huntington feared the institutionalization of what Theodore Roosevelt a century earlier had called “hyphenated Americans.” A “hyphenated American,” Roosevelt scoffed, “is not an American at all.” And 30 years ago, another progressive stalwart and American historian Arthur Schlesinger argued in his book The Disuniting of America that identity politics were tearing apart the cohesion of the United States.

What alarmed these liberals was the long and unhappy history of racial, religious, and ethnic chauvinism, and how such tribal ties could prove far stronger than shared class affinities. Most important, they were aware that identity politics had never proved to be a stabilizing influence on any past multiracial society. Indeed, most wars of the 20th century and associated genocides had originated over racial and ethnic triumphalism, often by breakaway movements that asserted tribal separateness. Examples include the Serbian and Slavic nationalist movements in 1914 against Austria-Hungary, Hitler’s rise to power on the promise of German ethno-superiority, the tribal bloodletting in Rwanda, and the Shiite/Sunni/Kurdish conflicts in Iraq.

The United States could have gone the way of these other nations. Yet, it is one of the few successful multiracial societies in history. America has survived slavery, civil war, the Japanese-American internment, and Jim Crow—and largely because it has upheld three principles for unifying, rather than dividing, individuals. […]

That is, in large part why this experiment has worked, it doesn’t matter who you are, you have got a shot. It may not be a fair shot, by any means, let alone your lights, but it’s a shot, all the same. It’s worked, and it’s worked pretty well, overall.

In the late 1960s, however, these three principles took a hit. The federal government lost confidence in the notion that civil rights legislation, the melting pot, and a growing economy could unite Americans and move society in the direction of Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision—“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

This shift from the ideal of the melting pot to the triumph of salad-bowl separatism occurred, in part, because the Democratic Party found electoral resonance in big government’s generous entitlements and social programs tailored to particular groups. By then, immigration into the United States had radically shifted and become less diverse. Rather than including states in Europe and the former British Commonwealth, most immigrants were poorer and almost exclusively hailed from the nations of Latin America, Asia, and Africa, resulting in poorer immigrants who, upon arrival, needed more government help. Another reason for the shift was the general protest culture of the Vietnam era, which led to radical changes in everything from environmental policy to sexual identity, and thus saw identity politics as another grievance against the status quo.

A half-century later, affirmative action and identity politics have created a huge diversity industry, in which millions in government, universities, and the private sector are entrusted with teaching the values of the Other and administering de facto quotas in hiring and admissions. In 2016, Hillary Clinton ran a campaign on identity politics, banking on the notion that she could reassemble various slices of the American electorate, in the fashion that Barack Obama had in 2008 and 2012, to win a majority of voters. She succeeded, as did Obama, in winning the popular vote by appealing directly to the unique identities of gays, Muslims, feminists, blacks, Latinos, and an array of other groups, but misjudged the Electoral College and so learned that a numerical majority of disparate groups does not always translate into winning key swing states. […]

In doing so, she (and some before her) have gone far to negating the social contract that built America.

Finally, ideology is eroding the diversity industry. Conservative minorities and women are not considered genuine voices of the Other, given their incorrect politics. For all its emphasis on appearance, diversity is really an intolerant ideological movement that subordinates race and gender to progressive politics. It is not biology that gives authenticity to feminism, but leftwing assertions; African-American conservatives are often derided as inauthentic, not because of purported mixed racial pedigrees, but due to their unorthodox beliefs.

The 2016 election marked an earthquake in the diversity industry. It is increasingly difficult to judge who we are merely by our appearances, which means that identity politics may lose its influence. These fissures probably explain some of the ferocity of the protests we’ve seen in recent weeks. A dying lobby is fighting to hold on to its power.

via The End Of Identity Politics

I’ve skipped a huge amount here, especially of his reasoning, which is sound. So, by all means, read the link. But what stands out here, is the idea of America, where we count the individual, not the group (increasingly, groups) to which he belongs. I think he’s correct, and I suspect we are going to be exploring some of the material we’ve written about lately, in more detail.


About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

16 Responses to The End Of Identity Politics

  1. Btw, and ya knew I would say this perhaps? But for the real Christian, British as well as American, the only lasting “identity” is Jesus Christ, and as Lord! Indeed the Lordship of Christ changes all for the regenerate Christian! And I say this for the so-called High Church, as well as the Low Church, there is only ONE “Christ Jesus”, HIS Saviorhood and Redemption!

    “The non-theological christ is popular; he wins votes; but he is not mighty; he does not break men into small pieces and create them anew.” (P.T. Forsyth) Humanity needs the Theological and Biblical Christ!

    We Homo sapiens need to simplify, and spiritually-wholly if we are going to survive! We must once again: “find ourselves”! Is this still possible is the great question to my mind?

    Liked by 1 person

    • And btw, there is ONLY “One” Kingdom for the Christian, i.e. the interior Kingdom of God In Jesus Christ! (Luther’s, or Lutheranism’s two kingdoms doctrine has failed terribly!)

      Liked by 1 person

      • NEO says:

        There I disagree, it has proved most useful for separating the things of this world from those of the next.


        • But it is only true when we view it from the top to the bottom, i.e. God is always Totally Other, Transcendent, He is also in the world, but not of it (though He made it, but only “allowed” it to Fall) as was His Son and Christ… and as we Christians are called to be, in it, but NOT of it!

          Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a modern example of this in our time! See his fine book The Cost Of Discipleship, and Bonhoeffer was a Lutheran to some degree.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Btw again, thanks to engage on these most serious questions, and once again for our time! 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

        • NEO says:

          Glad to! 🙂


    • NEO says:

      Yep, no surprise there, and in many ways, it won’t surprise you that I agree. 🙂


  2. the unit says:

    Yeah, as he says “Finally, ideology is eroding the diversity industry.” Paraphrasing among others…conservative Blacks are not really Blacks because they’ve left the plantation. And ideological Obama said ISIL isn’t Islamic. Can’t judge who they are merely by their declarations, appearances, and actions, of chopping off heads. Politics aside in relation to groupings, that’s really loosing your identity individually. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • NEO says:

      It sure is! Rather uncomfortable too, or so I would assume. 🙂


    • Ideology is simply the study of ideas, their nature and source. But sadly many on the left and the right, don’t truly “study” anything! I was raised classic old school Irish Roman Catholic in Ireland in the 50’s and early 1960’s, and I would call it Traditional Roman Catholicism, but NOT necessarily overtly conservative, strictly speaking. This guy “Mundabor” is just a Right-Wing overt Roman Catholic, but NOT a true Catholic ideologue. Again, my two-cents at least. And I am myself still somewhat friendly with Traditional Catholicism and Catholics therein, though of course critical of it. But, I am also NO fan of so-called “Francis”, who is attacking Traditional Catholics and Traditional Catholicism.

      Liked by 1 person

      • And yes, I feel I have some Roman Catholic friends (and extended family members) who I consider truly regenerate In Christ, though we often disagree, and sometimes hotly. But, I seek anyway to make this theological and historical! 🙂 Btw, true debate is an art, and must be worked at!

        Liked by 1 person

        • NEO says:

          Boy is that the truth! Both statements, BTW 🙂


        • Amen! We need to remember that as believers we must be Christ to each other, as members of His Body, even as flawed as we all are! 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

        • I have said this over and over, but it still bears repeating, but we will all be quite surprised who is in heaven, and who is not! But, we MUST be humbled and thankful that we ourselves could be there! Such is God’s great mercy, grace and glory! To GOD be the Glory to save and redeem sinful beings!

          Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: The Weekly Headlines – My Daily Musing

  4. Pingback: The Weekly Headlines – My Daily Musing – Br Andrew's Muses

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.