SLOPPY WORDS BUT THE SUBSTANCE WAS TRUE

sweden-riots-840x469Melanie Phillips wrote about the comments Trump made in his speech last week about Sweden. Here’s a bit

It turns out he’d been talking about a TV documentary on this subject to which he’d seen a reference the previous evening. This was a report by Ami Horowitz which said there had been a surge of gun violence and rape once Sweden began its “open door” policy towards immigrants, that the government had “gone out of its way to try to cover up some of these problems” and that the country now had Muslim “no-go zones” ruled by sharia law.

That report itself was criticised for being distorted. Swedish politicians rushed to state that such problems were simply unknown. The city of Malmo was a model of multicultural harmony. One of the police officers interviewed by Horowitz said their comments had been taken out of context. “He is a madman.” And so on.

Just a few hours later, violence erupted in the Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby after a mob of around 30 began attacking officers with rocks and setting fire to cars. But Trump had not been exercising metaphysical powers of prophecy. Both he and Ami Horowitz were accurately reflecting Swedish reality, as has been steadily reported over many years despite attempts by the Swedish authorities to suppress such information.

Yeah, well, imagine that. Many, many of us have been saying much the same thing about Sweden for years. But the Swedish government has its head so thoroughly buried in the sand that they probably couldn’t do anything if they wanted to, which they don’t. The sad fact of it is that to them, and their counterparts all across Europe, as well as many in the United States, their narrative is far more important than the safety of their citizens.

Hell of a way to run a railroad, in my opinion, but there we are.

His supporters appear to be discounting the falsehoods or inaccuracies in his loose and careless talk because they have decided he is telling the truth about the stuff that actually matters and they can work out perfectly well what he is saying. The distinction they appear to be making is not between truth and falsehood but between Trump’s sloppy inaccuracies or boastful exaggeration on the one hand, which they don’t think are that important, and on the other hand the lies or omissions by the mainstream media, which they think matter a great deal.

That’s pretty much true, I expect, and I too wish he would be a bit more careful with his accuracy. But you know, for all that he does tend to bloviate a bit, what he says, is not untrue, merely a bit opaque, and if you are like us, people who care more about the results than the words it is not all that difficult to figure out. And in fact, he sticks far closer to the truth than, say, Obama, ever did. The difference is that the PC establishment, European elites, and the news media (look, a threepeat!) are looking for gotchas, and anybody speaking mostly without a script, are going to make them. Melanie is correct, though, I don’t think many of us, who are his boss, really care, as long as we get results.

Be that as it may, Trump needs to be far more careful about how he talks. Words matter, and it is simply not on for the President of the United States to make comments which are so carelessly inaccurate. It allows his enemies to paint him as a liar …

via Sloppy words but the substance was true | MelaniePhillips.com

Maybe, but I’m convinced that they would paint him as a liar if he said the sky is blue. I don’t condone falsehood at any time, but that is not really what this is about, is it?

Advertisements

About NEO
Lineman, Electrician, Industrial Control technician, Staking Engineer, Inspector, Quality Assurance Manager, Chief Operations Officer

7 Responses to SLOPPY WORDS BUT THE SUBSTANCE WAS TRUE

  1. the unit says:

    Yeah, well who cares about sloppy? When his chief strategist looks like a homeless guy and a dirty old man according to Christopher Dickey of The Daily Beast (@ MSNBC). At least he said that’s what the Europeans say when they see him.
    Speaking of sloppy, wife fixed the ingredients for tacos for supper last night. The ingredients, I had to built it by myself, well two of them. Sprinkling them into the taco shell was so messy. Ground meat, grated cheese, sour cream, chopped lettuce, and taco sauce all over the counter and my fingers. Sloppy but sure was good results for my taste buds and in my tummy. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • NEO says:

      Yep, and one of the reason I switched to flour tortillas. Hmmm, now I’m hungry! 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

    • bydesign001 says:

      Excellent post. So many are late to the party. We figured this all out years ago.

      Moving on, waiting for dinner to hurry up and just get done already. The taco reference is doing me in. Must hold on, 20 more minutes.

      Liked by 1 person

      • NEO says:

        Isn\t that the truth.

        Quite, I ended up going to the store, and the tacos were good. Hadn’t made them for a while! 🙂

        Like

      • the unit says:

        So you and NEO got the hungries? 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

  2. the unit says:

    I missed what many, many of us has been saying about Sweden for years. I guess it is about the government and not the people. This guy was probably a pretty good fellow as he knew about watermelon wine. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • NEO says:

      I’ve been seeing it for at least a couple of years, but if you’ve been reading the media, not so much.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s